SEARCH SITE:

HOME

NEW ARTICLES

Analysis
Teaching Peace from Tales of the City: Peace Education through the Memoryscapes of Nagasaki Patporn Phoothong
Special Report
Reflections of Refugees in Africa Wyclife Ong'eta Mose
Feature
Freedom of Expression Under Threat in Zambia Mariateresa Garrido
Essay
Women’s Political Representation in Sri Lanka: Leading towards Prosperity or Peril Pujika Rathnayake
Comment
The political Crisis of the 2017 Honduran Election Daniel Bagheri S.
Letters
Notes On A Controversy Amardo Rodriguez

RECENT ARTICLES
Analysis
The Unraveled and Disquieting Human Rights Violation of Afghanistan Priya Pandey
Special Report
Nepal's recovery process since the 2015 earthquake Jini Agrawal
In-depth
Challenges and prospects of AU to implement the Ezulwini Consensus: The case of collective security and the use of force Tunamsifu Shirambere Philippe
Policy
The Right to Food Shant Melkonian
Feature
Land of the Golden Pagodas: Checking in on Myanmar’s Peace Process Monica Paniagua
Interview
Douglas Janoff on LGBTQIA Human Rights Luciana Téllez
Essay
Common Things: Communication, Community, Communal Peacebuilding Lina Patricia Forero Martínez
Comment
Periodismo Ciudadano e Internet Gina Paola Parra
Research Summary
Water Security in the Sixaola River Basin Adrián Martinez Blanco and Diana Ubico Durán
Poetry
Reborn Arunima Chouguley
Letters
An Open Letter to the American People: Political Responsibility in the Nuclear Age Richard Falk, David Krieger, and Robert Laney

ARCHIVES

Editorial
Last Updated: 05/29/2003
Civilization has to begin somewhere…..
Simon Stander

Charity, so the saying goes, begins at home. So does non-violence. One of the ways to begin to stop war is to ensure that the death penalty is abolished worldwide. Campaigning for the eradication of ritualised state violence by national governments at least highlights the fact that if we want a peaceful non-violent world a good starting point would be robbing the state of its power to put people to death. In the chilling Annual Report of Amnesty International (2003), we find horrifying accounts of which countries do what to their unfortunate citizens and others who live within their national boundaries.

 

Continent by continent the Report gives details of extra-judicial executions, disappearances, torture and ill-treatment, prisoners of conscience, detention without trial, human rights abuses by armed opposition groups…and the operation of the death penalty. For Asia the list goes: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea North and South, Laos, Myanmar, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Viet Nam. The African list is almost as long: Burundi, CAR, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mauritania, DRC, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia. The list for the Americas and the Caribbean is much shorter: Bahamas, Cuba, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Santa Lucia and the USA. (Only one country in the Americas actually carried out any executions, and the larger concentration of those was in Texas.)

 

The Europeans, in the shape of the European Union, will not allow new members to join if their national law allows capital punishment. Europe and Latin America have that in common, at least. No ritualised State executions. That does not say all that much, since in some of these countries the use of force is routine. Amnesty International report, for instance, 703 police killings in Brazil’s Sao Paulo alone. So, ending ritual executions, does not stop the State killing people one way or another, but at least it is a minimal beginning. Civilization has to start somewhere.

 

The 2003 Amnesty International Annual Report, published 28 May 2003, can be purchased for $21. (www.amnesty.org/report2003/index-eng

Footer