Strategies for building awareness for the potential of peace education in Cameroon Ben Oru Mforndip
Special Report
Has Democracy Enhanced Development in Africa? Conrad John Masabo
Permanent Emergency Powers in France: The ‘Law to Strengthen Internal Security and the Fight Against Terrorism’ and the Protection of Human Rights Lena Muhs
Women’s Political Representation in Sri Lanka: Leading towards Prosperity or Peril Pujika Rathnayake
Lack of empathy as a threat to peace Victoria Scheyer
Comment II
The death of democracy in Honduras Daniel Bagheri S.
Berta Vive Daniel Bagheri Sarvestani
The Persons Who Changed the Lives of Terrorists and Criminals Surya Nath Prasad

Teaching Peace from Tales of the City: Peace Education through the Memoryscapes of Nagasaki Patporn Phoothong
Special Report
Reflections of Refugees in Africa Wyclife Ong'eta Mose
Challenges and prospects of AU to implement the Ezulwini Consensus: The case of collective security and the use of force Tunamsifu Shirambere Philippe
The Right to Food Shant Melkonian
Freedom of Expression Under Threat in Zambia Mariateresa Garrido
Douglas Janoff on LGBTQIA Human Rights Luciana Téllez
Common Things: Communication, Community, Communal Peacebuilding Lina Patricia Forero Martínez
The political Crisis of the 2017 Honduran Election Daniel Bagheri S.
Research Summary
Water Security in the Sixaola River Basin Adrián Martinez Blanco and Diana Ubico Durán
Reborn Arunima Chouguley
An Open Letter to the American People: Political Responsibility in the Nuclear Age Richard Falk, David Krieger, and Robert Laney


Comment II
Last Updated: 10/14/2009
Statement on the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize
David Krieger

Obama should use the moral support of the Nobel prize to bolster his efforts to eliminate nuclear arms in our time.

When the Nobel Committee announced the awarding of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama they indicated that they “attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”  There is no doubt that Obama’s vision has brought new hope to this issue so critical for humanity’s future.  It is clear that without America’s leadership it will not be possible to make serious progress on the elimination of nuclear weapons and, as president, Obama has expressed his commitment to that leadership.

Barack Obama is a purveyor of hope and this was recognized by the Nobel Committee.  “Only very rarely,” they said, “has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.”  That hope is an inspiration to action to bolster cooperation among nations and change the world. 

In commenting on the award, Obama was humble about his accomplishments and about being in the company of “the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize.”  He said he would accept the award “as a call to action, a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century.” 

President Obama drew attention to the dangers of nuclear proliferation “in which the terror of a nuclear holocaust endangers more people.”  He indicated that this was the reason that America had “begun to take concrete steps to pursue a world without nuclear weapons.”  He could have, but did not, point with pride to his recent leadership at the United Nations Security Council resulting in a unanimous council resolution on nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament.

Only one comment of the president in response to the award struck a discordant note, and that was his reiteration of his statement in Prague that the elimination of nuclear weapons may not be completed in his lifetime.  He should be careful about lowering expectations on this most critical of all issues for the human future.  In this context, he should bolster his own hope, along with the hopes of people across the globe, of achieving this goal within a far more compressed timeframe.

David Krieger is President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. More articles at