SEARCH SITE:

HOME

NEW ARTICLES

Analysis
Teaching Peace from Tales of the City: Peace Education through the Memoryscapes of Nagasaki Patporn Phoothong
Special Report
Reflections of Refugees in Africa Wyclife Ong'eta Mose
Feature
Freedom of Expression Under Threat in Zambia Mariateresa Garrido
Essay
Women’s Political Representation in Sri Lanka: Leading towards Prosperity or Peril Pujika Rathnayake
Comment
The political Crisis of the 2017 Honduran Election Daniel Bagheri S.
Letters
Notes On A Controversy Amardo Rodriguez

RECENT ARTICLES
Analysis
The Unraveled and Disquieting Human Rights Violation of Afghanistan Priya Pandey
Special Report
Nepal's recovery process since the 2015 earthquake Jini Agrawal
In-depth
Challenges and prospects of AU to implement the Ezulwini Consensus: The case of collective security and the use of force Tunamsifu Shirambere Philippe
Policy
The Right to Food Shant Melkonian
Feature
Land of the Golden Pagodas: Checking in on Myanmar’s Peace Process Monica Paniagua
Interview
Douglas Janoff on LGBTQIA Human Rights Luciana Téllez
Essay
Common Things: Communication, Community, Communal Peacebuilding Lina Patricia Forero Martínez
Comment
Periodismo Ciudadano e Internet Gina Paola Parra
Research Summary
Water Security in the Sixaola River Basin Adrián Martinez Blanco and Diana Ubico Durán
Poetry
Reborn Arunima Chouguley
Letters
An Open Letter to the American People: Political Responsibility in the Nuclear Age Richard Falk, David Krieger, and Robert Laney

ARCHIVES

Policy
Last Updated: 11/16/2009
Obama's Efforts for Indigenous Cooperation
Nicole Loschke and Ken Thomas

November 5th, 2009 marked the first White House Tribal Nations Conference. This conference brought together 564 delegates from each federally recognized American Indian tribe. The first meeting of its kind in US history is a significant effort from the Obama administration to recognize Indigenous groups inside the US. Obama outlined his willingness to work together with the Native Nations to better affectively meet the needs of all US Americans, stating that the conference was “…part of a lasting conversation that’s crucial to our shared future.”

Obama’s message for the “First Americans” included mentions of past wrong-doings and a commitment to a cooperative future, “I believe Washington can’t and shouldn’t dictate a policy for agenda for Indian Country. Tribal Nations do better when they make their own decisions.” Obama has set a 90 day time period for suggestions on how to better incorporate Native leaders in Washington’s policy-making.

The president also addressed several issues that Native Americans have been pushing for years, including education, health care, Indian sovereignty, economic development, suicide rates in reserves, access to safe drinking water and of course land rights. The Obama administration has granted $3 billion (USD) to tribal communities to address these issues, specifically education, “I am absolutely committed to moving forward with you and forging a new and better future together. It’s a commitment that’s deeper than our unique nation to nation relationship, it’s a commitment to getting this relationship right so you can be full partners in the American economy and so your children and grandchildren can have an equal shot at pursuing the American dream.”

This article, published in "Indian Country News" expands on Obama's conversation with the Native American leaders about land rights and reform, as well as development and sustainability issues.


News From Indian Country--

Ken Thomas- Washington, D.C. (AP) 11/09

USDA Says it Wants to Resolve Farmers' Lawsuit

The Obama administration intends to seek resolution to a lawsuit filed by American Indian farmers who alleged discrimination in the granting of federal agricultural loans over three decades.

The lawsuit, filed in 1999, contends Indian farmers and ranchers lost about $500 million during the past three decades because of discrimination in lending from the Agriculture Department’s Farm Service Agency. The agency issues loans to farmers and ranchers who cannot get credit from commercial lenders.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told Indian farmers and ranchers during a meeting Nov. 5 that the department was “committed to resolving” litigation involving them.

Justice Department spokeswoman Melissa Schwartz said the case is expected to be considered again by the court early next year. While it “would be premature to discuss settlement” at this time, she said the Agriculture and Justice departments “will give fair consideration to settling claims based on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

The lawsuit, named after George Keepseagle, a Fort Yates, N.D., rancher, claimed the Agriculture Department denied or delayed loans or failed to approve enough money for tribal farmers and ranchers.

Indian farmers and ranchers have said local USDA officials tried to squeeze them out of business by denying them loans that instead went to their white neighbors and by refusing to restructure loans in bad years as was done for whites.

“It’s a detriment to us to have to be put in a position where, truly, the non-Indian farmers and ranchers are getting all the help and we’re not,” said Cedric Black Eagle, chairman of the Crow Tribe in southeastern Montana.

The plaintiffs estimate that Indian farmers lost out on more than $14 billion in loans from 1981 to 2006. The loans would have generated $462 million to $491 million in income, according to the estimate.

The case was granted class-action status in 2001 and the plaintiffs have said they are ready to go to trial. But they have expressed hope the Obama administration would consider a settlement, pointing to a similar one that USDA reached with black farmers under President Bill Clinton in 1999. The government has paid damages of $980 million in that case even as it has fought the Indian lawsuit in court.

Vilsack, during a daylong meeting of the Obama administration with tribal leaders, said his department realized that “we, too, have litigation going on for a considerable period of time involving farmers and we’re committed to resolving this.”

Along with damages, the plaintiffs are seeking changes in the way the USDA administers its loan programs, as well as a moratorium on foreclosures against struggling Indian farmers and ranchers.

American Indians also are seeking billions of dollars from the government in a separate lawsuit that claims they were swindled out of oil, gas, grazing, timber and other royalties administered by the Interior Department since 1887.


http://indiancountrynews.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7880&Itemid=5
Nicole Loschke is the Assitant Editor of the Peace and Conflict Monitor. She recieved her MA in Media, Peace and Conflict Studies from the University for Peace. Your comments or questions are welcome, nloschke@upeace.org

“News from Indian Country” an online publication and part of Indian Country Communications, Inc. The organization is an independent media source operated and owned by American Indian Natives. The publication is based on the Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe Reservation in Wisconsin, USA. According to it's website, while the publication does have ties to the reservation, it is “not owned, or politically controlled by a tribal government.” The content of the publication is developed through reader contributions.

http://indiancountrynews.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=63


Footer