|
|
|
|
HOME Regionalism and Reconciliation A Comparison of the French-German and Chinese-Japanese Model Dr. Gao Lan The Conflict in Chechnya: Confronting the Threat of State Disintegration and the Right to Self-Determination Shavkat Kasymov Rehabilitation and Deradicalization: Saudi Arabia’s Counterterrorism Successes and Failures Rob Wagner Kenya's New Constitution John Onyando Korup National Park - The Displacement of the Indigenous People: Voluntary or by Force? Tazoacha Francis Remarks at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Ceremony Ban Ki Moon RECENT ARTICLES MAINTAINING PEACE IN ASIA: INDIA-JAPAN RELATIONS Rupakjyoti Borah Politics of Transitional Justice Mechanisms from Below: The Case of Somaliland Adam Haji Ali Ahmed Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration of Ex-Combatants in Conflict Affected Northern Uganda Moses Tumusiime Challenging International Law: Israeli attack on Iraq´s Osiraq Nuclear Reactor Franklin Murianki Thoughts on a Recent Celebration in Mexico: An Interesting Parallel Pandora Hopkins Anger in Costa Rica over deal to ‘invite’ 46 US warships Daniel Tencer Peace needs Messengers Oscar Arias Sanchez ARCHIVES Past Comment II
|
COMMENT II
Statement on the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize
David Krieger October 14, 2009 Obama should use the moral support of the Nobel prize to bolster his efforts to eliminate nuclear arms in our time. When the Nobel Committee announced the awarding of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama they indicated that they “attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.” There is no doubt that Obama’s vision has brought new hope to this issue so critical for humanity’s future. It is clear that without America’s leadership it will not be possible to make serious progress on the elimination of nuclear weapons and, as president, Obama has expressed his commitment to that leadership. Barack Obama is a purveyor of hope and this was recognized by the Nobel Committee. “Only very rarely,” they said, “has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.” That hope is an inspiration to action to bolster cooperation among nations and change the world. In commenting on the award, Obama was humble about his accomplishments and about being in the company of “the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize.” He said he would accept the award “as a call to action, a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century.” President Obama drew attention to the dangers of nuclear proliferation “in which the terror of a nuclear holocaust endangers more people.” He indicated that this was the reason that America had “begun to take concrete steps to pursue a world without nuclear weapons.” He could have, but did not, point with pride to his recent leadership at the United Nations Security Council resulting in a unanimous council resolution on nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament. Only one comment of the president in response to the award struck a discordant note, and that was his reiteration of his statement in Prague that the elimination of nuclear weapons may not be completed in his lifetime. He should be careful about lowering expectations on this most critical of all issues for the human future. In this context, he should bolster his own hope, along with the hopes of people across the globe, of achieving this goal within a far more compressed timeframe. David Krieger is President of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. More articles at www.wagingpeace.org |